Yep, those of you that are either nerdy enough or old enough are now hearing the classic tune immortalised by Willie Nelson and Julio Iglesias (and yes, I had to look up how to spell Julio’s last name). I was wandering around the local shops today and whilst standing there, slowly salivating down the front of the cake cabinet of the bakery, I began to wonder exactly HOW “bad” or “good” a food can be. How do you define something that is “bad”? Well, there are the obvious, such as selling your kids on the internet (although there are some days where this is just almost too tempting to ignore) or stealing stuff, but when it comes to food, I have noticed that some people react to it in quite weird ways.
An example: sitting at a café with friends, a piece of chocolate mud cake arrives. The person who ordered it then sits there under the eyes of the others and tries to prove why they can eat this “bad” food. This has always puzzled me, as I am pretty sure that most of my friends don’t give a rat’s bum if I eat the cake or not. Well, they might, but because they know I don’t need extra padding and a fruit salad would be a healthier choice, but NOT because they think I am about to condemn my should to hell by eating chocolate cake. Therefore, is food really “bad”? I just find it strange that when it comes ot food, it seems you are either on the side of the angels or devils and I am wondering about what falls into that no man’s land in between – what I like ot call “food purgatory”. When I think that something is bad, it is because it has done a wee on the carpet or nicked off with the rent money. I like to think of my food in terms of the level of affection I feel for it. This has, however, started to be re evaluated in recent times, as even though I am fond of a certain food, it may not in the long run be helping me. Kind of like that “friend”you make at the work christmas party because you gave them a lift home when their taxi didn’t turn up, but now won’t piss off no matter how much you drop hints that their personality and different attitude to hygiene just really aren’t things that you like.
Confused yet? Ok, this is what I mean in the food context : I love chinese and turkish takeaway food. I reckon that if I had the money, I would eat it at least twice a week. On the affection scale, it is a very deep like, bordering on infatuation. Sooooo when I found out that one of my favourite chinese dishes, Beijing Chilli Beef, has 1500 calories PER FRICKEN’ SERVE, the affection meter slipped to a mild interest. If I eat that meal, it means at least 120 minutes on the step machine or a whopping 4 hour swim. The food isn’t BAD, per se, but the after effects of eating it aren’t that grand. I must also admit that my attitude to veggies is somewhat luke warm on the old affection scale, but they’ll do for now and I am willing to work on the relationship. There will just be days when I don’t care how “good” they are, they will still piss me right off and no matter how much affection I have in reserve, it just isn’t going to work.
I guess what I am trying to explain here is that for me – and I suspect others like me – changing your attitude to food is like changing how you see a relationship. To all of you who just see food as fuel and don’t have any emotional attachment to food, what I am talking about now will make no sense to you at all and you should just go and chomp on some mung beans. Changing in a relationship can be hard and at times, the trauma is not worth it. I will stick with it though. I am hoping to move celery up my affection scale from “you’ve got to be joking?????’ to “not so bad”. Does this mean I need vegetable counselling? I hope not.